>Anyway part of my point was that more bad intelligence is worse, not better.
>Word 6 has more bad intelligence than Word 5, to compare, well I guess
>oranges.
How do you determine 'bad' intelligence? Also have you noticed how
Billionaire Bill has been drawing AI technologies slowly into his products?
With IE 4.0 you will be able to create a profile of yourself much like
Firefly and use collective intelligence to 'learn' what you like and enjoy.
The more unique an individual you are, the less accurate the profile will
be. But this also brings out new privacy matters where someone can create a
perfect and current psychological profile on you to predict your actions.
If it came down to an option of makeing my psychological profile public or
handing it over to the gov't, I'd go with the first option.
"Risk: You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage
to lose sight of the shore."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Chris Hind (chind@juno.com) Upward, Outward, ACTION!
Email attachments: (bholat@earthlink.net)
NeoReality (Personal) http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/6810/
Ethereal Outlook (Extropian)
http://www.geocities.com/CapeCanaveral/6810/outlook.htm
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
#!/usr/local/bin/perl-0777---export-a-crypto-system-sig-RC4-3-lines-PERL
@k=unpack('C*',pack('H*',shift));for(@t=@s=0..255){$y=($k[$_%@k]+$s[$x=$_
]+$y)%256;&S}$x=$y=0;for(unpack('C*',<>)){$x++;$y=($s[$x%=256]+$y)%256;
&S;print pack(C,$_^=$s[($s[$x]+$s[$y])%256])}sub S{@s[$x,$y]=@s[$y,$x]}