Re: 160 for Space Migration

Date: Sun Feb 17 2002 - 15:02:17 MST

In a message dated 2/17/2002 4:40:16 PM Eastern Standard Time, writes:

<< I too dismissed the article as having too little creative thought.
 Why sperm banks? Better to maintain genetic diversity would
 be embryo banks. They could be maaany generations into
 the mission before the colony produced any two persons who
 were genetically related.
 Before I take seriously any multigeneration scheme, I want to
 see what they propose for an energy storage mechanism. Chemical
 sources would likely be way insufficient to store adequate
 energy. Fission sources, altho problematic in many ways,
 are likely the most practical for the long haul.
 In comparison to the energy problem, maintaining genetic
 diversity over millenia is trivial.
 spike >>
Harvey and yourself have an excellent point. But I look at the article as not
a "this is the way to go!" declarative statement, but merely an essay
connoting that "all things being equal" if we have to rely on our current
understanding of technology, here is what it takes to make a 'sustainable
community.' To take it any other way is to give too much emphasis to one essay

It is not inconceivable that 'real' instersteller travel may be performed by
100,000 uploaded brains, living in a Minsky-Yudkowskian, VR realm. All this
while traveling at relativistic speeds, on a craft the size of a postage
stamp. If this seems to be technical unfeasible in the centuries to come, is
a Dyson Orion type spacecraft so totally out of the quesion?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:39 MST