From: Olga Bourlin (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Feb 07 2002 - 05:06:50 MST
From: "Samantha Atkins" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> Dehede011@aol.com wrote:
> > Samantha,
> > If I understand you correctly you are right -- under various
> > dictatorships "progress requiring more concentrated energy/material
> > resources and greater organization" has been made. However I believe
> > all of these todate have eventually collapsed of their own weight, in
> > the long run slowing progress. Or, did I misunderstand you?
> Are you imply dictatorships are the only alternative to
> capitalism or what dresses itself up in that name today?
How does capitalism dress up, in your opinion? IMO, whether dressing in
traditional vestments, or preferring the latest in haute couture fashions:
oligarchy seems to be the clothing of choice in Capitalism, USA.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:38 MST