Re: META: Subject line profanity considered [really dumb]

From: Dossy (
Date: Thu Jan 03 2002 - 21:38:24 MST

On 2002.01.03, Randy Smith <> wrote:
> Gotta disagree...."profane" words are profane for a reason; they
> communicate ideas that other phraseology is unable to communicate.

Now I'm curious. Could you provide a specific example?

-- Dossy

Dossy Shiobara                       mail: 
Panoptic Computer Network             web: 
  "He realized the fastest way to change is to laugh at your own
    folly -- then you can let go and quickly move on." (p. 70)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 01 2002 - 13:37:32 MST