RE: appalling laziness and presumption?

From: Damien Broderick (d.broderick@english.unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Mon Feb 05 2001 - 18:48:48 MST

Next message: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: PDAs are searchable by cops, I expect. Re: Transparency, wasre: On January 28th, Criminals No Longer Another Face ..."
In reply to: Chuck Kuecker: "RE: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Next in thread: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Reply: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

At 05:35 PM 5/02/01 -0600, Chuck Kuecker wrote:

>> twat (twot) n. Obscene
>> 1. The vulva.
>> 2. Used as a disparaging term for a woman.

>I think he meant "twit". Freudian slip, anyone?

No, he meant `twat'. The poor thing was so affronted that he compared me to
the most unpleasant thing he could think of - a woman's genitals.

Ah well.

Damien Broderick

Next message: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Previous message: Ross A. Finlayson: "Re: PDAs are searchable by cops, I expect. Re: Transparency, wasre: On January 28th, Criminals No Longer Another Face ..."
In reply to: Chuck Kuecker: "RE: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Next in thread: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Reply: Dr Chris R. Tame: "Re: appalling laziness and presumption?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:35 MDT