Ah; a useful response. Thank you. Nice disclaimer on the "religious
side."
;)
jm
On 3 Feb 2001, at 7:20, Chris Russo wrote:
> At 00:53 -0800 2/3/01, John Marlow wrote:
> >Sure, I have my favorite side of the issue--but I'm still looking for
> >the facts, which, as history has shown, are often not in line with
> >prevailing theory...
>
> Why not go to where the information is?
>
> For the scientific side, see:
>
> <http://www.talkorigins.org/>
>
>
> For the religious side (which I discovered by accident a moment ago,
> but thought I'd mention):
>
> <http://www.origins.org>
>
>
> You could read some debate transcripts between scientists and
> creationists on the subject:
>
> <http://www.infidels.org/library/modern/science/creationism/debates.html>
>
>
> Alternatively, you might want to look into the religious side of the
> equation: Is the Bible accurate? Even if the theory of Evolution is
> heavily flawed, is there any reason to discard it in favor of the
> Biblical account? Visit the link below and join the Errancy
> discussion list:
>
> <http://www.infidels.org/electronic/email/secular.html>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Chris Russo
> --
> "If anyone can show me, and prove to me, that I am wrong in thought
> or deed, I will gladly change. I seek the truth, which never yet
> hurt anybody. It is only persistence in self-delusion and ignorance
> which does harm."
> -- Marcus Aurelius, MEDITATIONS, VI, 21
>
John Marlow
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:35 MDT