Re: Tired, was Re: Reductio ad Absurdum, was Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)

From: John Marlow (
Date: Wed Jan 31 2001 - 18:01:22 MST

You know what? You're quoting a specific response to a comment of
yours, out of context, to make it appear a contradiction.

It ain't worth the time to bicker.


Michael M. Butler wrote:

> Oh. I see. You meant the chances of some deep pockets starting up a
> program to ship permanent inhabitants in a self-sustaining colony
> week, and pursuing it to completion, were a billion to one.
> Well. Duh.

Response was:

> > Ah, well. No, actually I meant for the reasonably forseeable
> > And on the contrary, assuming ANYone's EVER going to fund it
> > approaches absurdity.


John Marlow

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:27 MDT