Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)

From: Spike Jones (spike66@attglobal.net)
Date: Tue Jan 30 2001 - 23:30:43 MST

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: Mars (sparked by RE: true abundance?)"
In reply to: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Reply: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

John Marlow wrote:

> Star drives and colonization are cool and desirable--but, dude, we've
> got a lot of prep to do right here, right now, if we're ever gonna
> get there.

So lets do it. Whats the problem? Why should it take a century?
Star drives are difficult, but the asteroids are right here in our
back yards. Hell we can reach those with primative chemical
rockets, fer cryin out loud. John what roadblocks are scaring
you? Write em out and lets deal with em. spike

Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: true abundance?"
Previous message: Spike Jones: "Re: Mars (sparked by RE: true abundance?)"
In reply to: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Next in thread: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Reply: John Marlow: "Re: from 6 billion to 500 million: how? (was RE: true abundance?)"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:26 MDT