Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> At 1:58 PM -0500 1/25/01, Michael Lorrey wrote:
> >Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> > > Where do I find studies
> > > that claim evidence that the ice-core and tree ring studies are
> > > wrong, or give different evidence that temperatures have not risen?
> >The fact is that over the last 3.2 million years, things have cooled
> >down 10 degrees. Any 'global warming' we instigate or that is caused by
> >the normal celestial mechanics (which actually fit climate change far
> >better than CO2 levels) of the earth is nowhere near the high
> >temperature levels that existed 3.2 million years ago, so any effects of
> >global warming will not be 'catastrophic'.
> Mike, this is a totally different argument than I was trying to
> address. I was looking for evidence that global warming is not
> occurring. All your articles seem to confirm that it is happening,
> and that it is "natural."
> Is this your position, that global warming is indeed occurring but
> that it is not man-made?
My position is that it is not man made. It is occuring, but not to the
extent the green idiots are hyping and is a variably shifting phenomenon
having to do with Malenkovich Cycles. The Ice Caps are not going
anywhere, nobody is gonna get flooded, the sky isn't falling. If you are
really worried, start building breeder reactors. Funny how the Greens
are not in favor of those either, in addition to their opposition to
seeding plankton with iron. Why is it that the Greens are opposed to the
very measures that would fix the problems they claim are occuring? Could
it be they have an agenda? They do, in fact have one, which I suggest
anyone with two cents look into. The Green Platform is published on the
web in many locations at varying levels of detail.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:25 MDT