Re: Velikovsky's was an imbecile

From: John Marlow (johnmarlow@gmx.net)
Date: Wed Jan 17 2001 - 20:34:58 MST


Ah. Evidence of Technotranscendence's observation.
I do not support Velikovsky, am not in fact familiar enough with his
works to render an opinion one way or the other, which is why I
specifically refrained from commenting on their veracity. You, on the
other hand, have studied the matter carefully, I'm sure.

jm

On 17 Jan 2001, at 11:04, John Clark wrote:

> John Marlow <johnmarlow@gmx.net> Wrote:
>
> > Well, saying nothing of Velikovsky's theories myself
>
> Ok, then I'll say something about Velikovsky, he was an idiot. The idea that Jupiter
> spat out a comet that then came near the earth and then caused the Red Sea to part
> and then went into a circular orbit around the sun and then became the planet Venus
> is too stupid for words. Mr. Marlow I must tell you, for or me and I think many members
> of this list your credibility just dropped about 85%.
>
> > I HAVE read that Einstein had told Velikovsky that if Jupiter was indeed
> > found to be emitting radio waves, he would reconsider V's theories
>
> Bullshit.
>
> >and that Albert Einstein died with one of Velikovsky's books open on his desk.
>
> No, I'll bet it was a book of more intellectual weight, like "Where's Waldo?", or perhaps
> a pop up book.
>
> John K Clark jonkc@att.net
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

John Marlow



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:20 MDT