Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin

From: Steve Nichols (
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 15:41:30 MST

Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 00:10:11 -0800
From: Samantha Atkins <>
Subject: Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin

> > However, "directed evolution" at least sounds plausible, and
> >some attention.

The post-human view can be encapsulated as "proactive evolution" .. but
there is a choice as to what "direction" any directed evolution should take.
> Religious people have not pushed directed evolution much and that is wise.

But the goal of the magus is to "equilibrate their personality" in order to
"direct the forces of nature." Magick is perhaps as close to science to
and *does* have a contribution to make .. the scientist ignores the
of their own personality, whereas the religious person only bothers with
and leaves direction of the forces of nature to God. Magick combines both.
Director Ltd

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:20 MDT