CONC: Re: ABUSE: Proposed new prefix (was g~u~n~s)

From: Adrian Tymes (wingcat@pacbell.net)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 22:15:21 MST


Harvey Newstrom wrote:
> Although most people would prefer not to see this topic at all, I
> think labelling it with an identifiable prefix would help mitigate
> the impact. By using the prefix it designates a change of topic from
> the original discussion to a discussion about the discussion. It
> keeps these discussions from occurring under unrelated subject lines.
> It helps other people avoid these discussion if they wish. Even if
> some of the original posts of this nature are not properly prefixed,
> replies to those post could be. This might help migrate such
> discussions into a thread with the prefix to help label it correctly.
>
> Please comment and participate in this new idea if you think it is
> worthwhile. Please use the "ABUSE:" prefix in your responses!

What beyond the aubject here needs be said?



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:20 MDT