Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin

From: John Marlow (johnmarlow@gmx.net)
Date: Tue Jan 16 2001 - 01:59:25 MST

Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Immortality decay (was Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now)"
Previous message: KPJ: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Next in thread: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Not that I disagree with them--but these are not my words you've responded
to.

john marlow

---

J.R. Molloy wrote:

From: "John Marlow" <johnmarlow@gmx.net> > ...that something else important might be going on > which we can't see yet, that merrits attention too.

Sure it does.

Here, have a whiff of White Powder of Gold, and maybe you'll see it.

--J. R.

The future of machines is biology. --KK

-- The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can't, and the incapacity the tell the difference. --Calvin

Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

Next message: Adrian Tymes: "Immortality decay (was Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now)"
Previous message: KPJ: "Re: Stewart Brand's The Clock of the Long Now"
In reply to: J. R. Molloy: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Next in thread: Eugene.Leitl@lrz.uni-muenchen.de: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:19 MDT