Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin

From: John Marlow (johnmarlow@gmx.net)
Date: Mon Jan 15 2001 - 23:30:44 MST

Next message: hal@finney.org: "Re: Extropians in NY Times Book Review"
Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Provincialism, was Re: Extropians in NY Times Book Review"
In reply to: John Clark: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Next in thread: Emlyn: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Reply: Emlyn: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Interesting link to Darwinism/Natural Selection hole-punching in favor of
directed evolution:

http://jamesphogan.com/bb/archives/evolution.shtml

john marlow

---

Emlyn <emlyn@one.net.au> Wrote:

> Being a creationist is pretty dumb, true. > However, "directed evolution" at least sounds plausible, and merrits >some attention.

-- The strength to change what I can, the inability to accept what I can't, and the incapacity the tell the difference. --Calvin

Sent through GMX FreeMail - http://www.gmx.net

Next message: hal@finney.org: "Re: Extropians in NY Times Book Review"
Previous message: Michael M. Butler: "Provincialism, was Re: Extropians in NY Times Book Review"
In reply to: John Clark: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Next in thread: Emlyn: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Reply: Emlyn: "Re: That (not so) idiot Darwin"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:19 MDT