This is extracted from The Edge, January 9th, 2001
http://www.edge.org/documents/questions/q2001.html
"When will overpopulation create worldwide starvation?"
They cordoned off the area and brought in disposal experts to defuse the
bomb, but it turned out to be full of — sawdust. The Population Bomb is truly
a dud, although this news and its implications have yet fully to sink into
the general consciousness.
Ideas can become so embedded in our outlook that they are hard to shake by
rational argument. As a Peace Corps Volunteer working in rural India in the
1960s, I vividly remember being faced with multiple uncertainties about what
might work for the modernization of India. There was only one thing I and my
fellow development workers could all agree on: India unquestionably would
experience mass famine by the 1980s at the latest. For us at the time this
notion was an eschatological inevitability and an article of faith.
For 35 years since those days, India has grown in population by over a
million souls a month, never failing to feed itself or earn enough to buy the
food it needs (sporadic famine conditions in isolated areas, which still
happen in India, are always a matter of communications and distribution
breakdown).
Like so many of the doomsayers of the twentieth century, we left crucial
factors out of our glib calculations. First, we failed to appreciate that
people in developing countries will behave exactly like people in the rest of
the world: as they improve their standard of living, they have fewer
children. In India, the rate of population increase began to turn around in
the 1970s, and it has declined since. More importantly, we underestimated the
capacity of human intelligence to adapt changing situations.
Broadly speaking, instead of a world population of 25 or 30 billion, which
some prophets of the 1960s were predicting, it now looks as though the peak
of world population growth might be reached within 25 to 40 years at a
maximum of 8.5 billion (just 2.5 billion above the present world population).
Even without advances in food technology, the areas of land currently out of
agricultural production in the United States and elsewhere will prevent
starvation. But genetic technologies will increase the quantities and
healthfulness of food, while at the same time making food production much
more environmentally friendly. For example, combining gene modification with
herbicides will make it possible to produce crops that induce no soil
erosion. New varieties will requires less intensive application of nitrogen
fertilizers and pesticides. If genetic techniques can control endemic pests,
vast areas of Africa could be brought into productive cultivation.
There will be no way to add 2.5 billion people to the planet without
environmental costs. Some present difficulties, such as limited supplies of
fresh water in Third World localities, will only get worse. But these
problems will not be insoluble. Moreover, there is not the slightest chance
that population growth will in itself cause famine. What will be fascinating
to watch, for those who live long enough to witness it, will be how the world
copes with an aging, declining population, once the high-point has been
reached.
The steady evaporation of the question, "When will overpopulation create
worldwide starvation?", has left a gaping hole in the mental universe of the
doomsayers. They have been quick to fill it with anxieties about global
warming, cellphones, the ozone hole, and Macdonaldization. There appears to
be a hard-wired human propensity to invent threats where they cannot clearly
be discovered. Historically, this has been applied to foreign ethnic groups
or odd individuals in a small-scale society (the old woman whose witchcraft
must have caused village children to die). Today's anxieties focus on broader
threats to mankind, where activism can mix fashionable politics with dubious
science. In this respect alone, the human race is not about to run out of
problems. Fortunately, it also shows no sign of running out of solutions.
DENIS DUTTON, founder and editor of the innovative Web page Arts & Letters
Daily (www.cybereditions.com/aldaily/), teaches the philosophy of art at the
University of Canterbury, New Zealand and writes widely on aesthetics. He is
editor of the journal Philosophy and Literature, published by the Johns
Hopkins University Press. Professor Dutton is a director of Radio New
Zealand, Inc.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:18 MDT