Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc..

• Next message: John Marlow: "Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework..."
• Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: primate"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Well, uhmm--creating something smarter than we are,
and then handing it all the weapons, doesn't strike me
as a particularly bright idea. To say the least.

john marlow

--- "Michael M. Butler" <butler@comp-lib.org> wrote:
> John Marlow wrote:
> >
> > Yeah. Obviously Drexler at least was thinking
> about
> > such things very early--as witness his "active
> > shields" riff. (Do NOT get me started on THAT
> one...)
>
> Why not? Have you given it up for Lent? ;)

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
http://photos.yahoo.com/

• Next message: John Marlow: "Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework..."
• Previous message: John Marlow: "Re: primate"
• Maybe in reply to: Michael M. Butler: "Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Next in thread: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Reply: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Reply: Michael M. Butler: "Re: Active shields, was Re: Criticism depth, was Re: Homework, Nuke, etc.."
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:18 MDT