Re: `molecular resonance sequencing': trick or treat?

From: CLIFMOM@aol.com
Date: Wed Jan 10 2001 - 21:27:53 MST

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Concering your neoluddite theory"
Previous message: Michael LaTorra: "Concering your neoluddite theory"
Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "`molecular resonance sequencing': trick or treat?"
Next in thread: hal@finney.org: "Re: `molecular resonance sequencing': trick or treat?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

There was a great article in New Scientist magazine last year about quantum
physics and genetics. It discussed why DNA has four base pairs instead of
just a binary two.

Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: Concering your neoluddite theory"
Previous message: Michael LaTorra: "Concering your neoluddite theory"
Maybe in reply to: Damien Broderick: "`molecular resonance sequencing': trick or treat?"
Next in thread: hal@finney.org: "Re: `molecular resonance sequencing': trick or treat?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Mon May 28 2001 - 09:56:18 MDT