>From: "Billy Brown" <bbrown@transcient.com>
>
>If there is another option that can be implemented without first becoming
>an
>authoritarian state I don't see it.
How about this scenario. Nanoassemblers are developed and the decision is
made to let the public benefit from them. But in order to be issued a
nanobox of your very own, you must first agree to have your every
interaction with any other human, computer or nanodevice recorded and
publicly stored.
So you have your choice, to be surveilled or not. Curious: Which would
*you* choose?
-Zero
"I like dreams of the future better than the history of the past"
--Thomas Jefferson
______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:06:50 MDT