Re: FreeNet downside

From: Zero Powers (zero_powers@hotmail.com)
Date: Thu Mar 23 2000 - 14:19:15 MST


>From: "Robert J. Bradbury" <bradbury@aeiveos.com>
>
>ABC News has a report on the downside of systems like FreeNet
>being used by criminals, hackers, etc.
>
>See:
> http://abcnews.go.com/sections/tech/DailyNews/freenet000322.html
>
>So, you clever folks, how do you give freedom to the oppressed
>with out giving unintended aid to the undesirables?

As I've said before, privacy is a thing of the present, not of the future.
I'm sure it will take quite some time for everyone to get on board, but the
only way to real freedom is mutually assured surveillance. Anonymity is
worthless to most law abiding citizens. As fewer legal things become
"taboo" anonymity will be completely worthless, except to criminals. It's
not Orwellian at all. It's me watching you watching me watching Big Brother
watching us all.

This is transparency. This is the way.

-Zero

"I like dreams of the future better than the history of the past"
--Thomas Jefferson

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:06:12 MDT