Re: SOC/LAW: Chimp Rights

From: Bryan Moss (bryan.moss@dial.pipex.com)
Date: Sun Feb 06 2000 - 09:25:20 MST


Greg Burch wrote:

> > - It weakens arguments that transhumanity is 'inhuman'
> > (or at the very least implies divergent species
> > should be granted the same basic rights as humans).
> >
> > - It sets a wonderful precedent for our super-
> > intelligent progeny.
>
> The last two points are the ones that seem to have the
> most pragmatic importance, from an extropian point of
> view. They are actually the principles that will be of
> greatest importance before (in the third point) and after
> (in the fourth point) the development of true "super-
> human" beings in avoiding the terrible visions of the
> transhuman Civil War that sometimes haunt my dreams of
> the future.

I think a good case can be made that the last point will be
of even more interest to our successors than it is to us.
An SI would be on a much steeper curve than us, and its
successor, an SSI, would arrive in a much shorter time.
Likewise an SSI would have even more reason to worry about
its treatment at the hands of its successor, and so on.

BM



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:29 MDT