I had a similar idea about cops who violated suspects' rights. Instead of
letting the suspect go free on a technicality, I propose that we go ahead
and prosecute the suspect in a court of law. Then we also prosecute the cop
for violating the suspects' rights. Two different crimes, and two different
trials. One alleged crime does not influence the judgement of the other.
-- Harvey Newstrom <http://harveynewstrom.com> Certified Consultant, Legal Hacker, Engineer, Research Scientist, Author.
----- Original Message ----- From: <EvMick@aol.com> To: <email@example.com> Sent: Wednesday, February 02, 2000 7:05 pm Subject: Re: A modest proposal (eas Re: Outlawing drug speech - EEK!)
> In a message dated 2/1/00 1:20:47 AM Central Standard Time, > firstname.lastname@example.org writes: > > > > > You know, I'm in favor of *one* strike--if the law turns out to be > > unconstitutional, all those who voted for it are found guilty of > > violation of their oaths of office, summarily convicted, and barred from > > ever holding public office and voting (and g*ns). Hmm, maybe the first > > offense just loses you the job. And overturns any votes you cast after > > that. > > > > Seems fair to me. > > > > I'm in favor of this as a general principle... > > Now how do we get it enacted? > > Probability zero. > > Evmick > Rogers Mn >
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:03:17 MDT