Clint O'Dell wrote:
<much interesting commentary elided>
How odd! You see, when I try to read between the lines of what I wrote,
it's obvious to me that I'm saying I have no way to gather enough data
to read beyond it. The sheaf of hypotheses lumped and labeled
"(G/g)od(s)" is too broad for me to meaningfully disprove. Popper and
all, you know.
Good luck with the mind reading. I'm sure it works for simple minds. I
do it too.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:37 MDT