QueeneMUSE wrote:
> I will say this: As Architects of our own Design we needn't apply old
labels
> and paradigms.
>
> Therefore I am also declaring myself a non-stupidist.
>
> (by the way: a nice lengthy discussion of soul (or psyche) is a valid one
to
> me, but how we choose to cal our disbelief in a creator figure is not.
Yeh, some threads attract my attention and others leave me flat, but it
doesn't
mean it is an invalid question, if for no other reason people consider it an
important issue. All the same labels and paradigms, as limiting as they may
be,
still remain the basis of communication and collective understanding.
Without
that your lost. Personally I think a lot of discussions (not in this group
necessarily)
get mired in sematics, but in this case, if you read or re-read, whatever
the case,
my posts there exists a major distinction. This is why discussions such as
these are
important.
Robert Wasley
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:36 MDT