Re: Cannot prove nor disprove a soul.

From: Joe E. Dees (
Date: Fri Jan 21 2000 - 16:13:07 MST

Subject: Re: Cannot prove nor disprove a soul.
Date sent: Fri, 21 Jan 100 14:03:22 -0800 (PST)
From: "Lee Daniel Crocker" < (none)>
Organization: Piclab (
Send reply to:

> > << The Christian god is easily disproved by definition. Given
> > no definition of god (well, a very wide one) it is absurd
> > beyond reason. >>
> > It is indeed rare where I've met someone with such arrogance that,
> > in one short sentence, dismisses the beliefs of over 2 billion people.
> It is unfortunately not rare to find people so insecure in their
> own observation and judgment that they would question their own most
> cherished beliefs simply because 2 billion people happen to disagree.
> It is also unfortunate that people can't be brutally, scrupulously
> honest about their beliefs without being seen as "rude". Dishonesty
> causes far more problems in the world than rudeness ever did.
> It is my sincere, honest, carefully considered, firmly held belief
> that Christian dogma is complete hogwash. To say anything less would
> be an insult to my audience and to philosophy as a whole. To take
> offense at such an honest expression is a fault of the listener, not
> the speaker.
I am in full agreement with you on this.
> --
> Lee Daniel Crocker <> <>
> "All inventions or works of authorship original to me, herein and past,
> are placed irrevocably in the public domain, and may be used or modified
> for any purpose, without permission, attribution, or notification."--LDC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:28 MDT