Re: Cryopreserving the unborn

From: Technotranscendence (
Date: Sun Jan 16 2000 - 21:46:54 MST

On Sunday, January 16, 2000 7:45 AM Doug Jones wrote:
> This is probably a bad idea- this would paint cryonics as an enabling
> technology for "babykillers". Cryonics is already afflicted with
> opposed flakes, this would expand that group dramatically. You should see
> the sort of security 21st Century Medicine has to have for their research
> facilities...

That has to be taken into account to, but I don't think hiding from
potential funding is a good idea.

Also, I'm not sure that pro-Lifers would think of it that way IF it could be
shown that it works for fetuses. I believe cryonics might work -- from
suspension to revival -- now with fetuses. I don't see how, if this is so,
most pro-Lifers wouldn't, at least, think of it as an alternative to
abortion without suspension.

Daniel Ust

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 27 2000 - 14:02:19 MDT