Re: How do you calm down the hot-heads?

From: Charles Hixson (charleshixsn@earthlink.net)
Date: Fri Sep 12 2003 - 10:26:53 MDT

  • Next message: Robbie Lindauer: "Re: cancer rates (was: e: How do you calm down the hot-heads?)"

    Randall Randall wrote:

    > ...
    > Well, limited liability is a State-enforced distortion of
    > the market, rather than something inherent in the market.
    > I agree that limited liability should be abolished.
    >

    Be quite careful here. The basic distortion is that the corporation is
    granted the rights of a person, without simultaneous having the limits
    or obligations of a person.

    Limited Liability Corporations legitimately shield their investors from
    many liabilities for the actions in corporations that the investors
    theoretically have partial ownership in, but over which they actually
    neither have either reasonable control or detailed knowledge. But I
    know of no ground for shielding the executives of the corporation from
    liability, as seems to be common practice. And I also feel that the
    board of directors should be more liable. And the individual employees,
    whether executives or not. If a corporation pours poison in a
    communities drinking water, then the entire chain of personnel involved
    should be liable. To the extent that they either knew or should have
    known. And one scapegoat should not be allowed to exculpate the rest.

    This vile example is based on a case where company (Monsanto?)
    calculated that it would cost them less in fines to dump poison in a
    community's drinking water supply than it would to clean it up properly.
      So they did. And they were right. Even though internal memos
    released during the trial showed that they had made this calculation
    ahead of time. Personally I think this was ground for confiscating the
    entire corpation, and selling it for it's assets, and for sending most
    of the management and most of the directors to jail for premeditated
    murder and many of the staff to jail for accessory during the fact. But
    they were, instead, given the fine which, as they had calculated, was
    less than the cost of cleaning things up properly was.

    As for the investors...most of them still don't know that it happened.
    And many don't even know that they are investors. (Investment through
    market large cap funds, e.g.) So while it's a reasonable penalty that
    they should loose their investment, they bear no real culpability.

    -- 
    -- Charles Hixson
    Gnu software that is free,
    The best is yet to be.
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Sep 12 2003 - 10:36:05 MDT