Re: Who'd submit to the benevolent dictatorship of GAI anyway?

From: Samantha Atkins (samantha@objectent.com)
Date: Tue Sep 02 2003 - 23:07:11 MDT

  • Next message: Amara Graps: "Re: tribal violence (was: RE: would you vote for this man?)"

    On Tuesday 02 September 2003 02:56, Brett Paatsch wrote:
    > Personally, I don't see myself doing so *voluntarily*
    > especially when any benevolence, real or alleged
    > would be a matter still to be determined at least so
    > far as I was concerned.
    >
    > Or am I missing the point here? How *would* a single
    > super general AI actually benefit? Would it have *no*
    > political power but say instantly suggest optimal game
    > theoretical solutions to otherwise intractable problems
    > or is it the super inventor that cares nothing for intellectual
    > property rights?
    >

    I am having trouble parsing what you might mean by either of those categories.

    - samantha

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Sep 02 2003 - 23:18:44 MDT