Re: What about the mystery?

From: JAY DUGGER (duggerj1@charter.net)
Date: Sun Aug 31 2003 - 17:07:13 MDT

  • Next message: Brett Paatsch: "Re: Aristotle's "lost" second book?"

    On Fri, 2003-08-29 at 17:13, Anders Sandberg wrote:
    > The Allknowing detected this for me:
    > http://www.globetechnology.com/servlet/ArticleNews/TPStory/LAC/20030829/CONUHUMAN29/TPTechnology
    >
    > How perfect do we want to be?
    >
    > In seeking immortality and other godlike attributes,
    > we risk our very humanity, says ethicist MARGARET
    > SOMERVILLE
    >
    > At least a pleasantly non-shrill tone of criticism, and I
    > think it is worth considering what our answer to her ought
    > to be.
    >

             Why respond? The piece at the URL above makes it
    seem as if the author thinks mysteries have some merit and
    deserve preserving. I've thought about it for three days,
    and my inital response holds: to hell with
    everyone who worships ignorance.

             As for what kind of world vastly extended life
    makes--immortality
    features in most ideas about "life-after-death", whether
    one pictures
    salvation, damnation, or reincarnation. Effort now by
    everyone can help
    make our collective future worthwhile.

             It would please me better to have some less
    vituperative suggestion,
    but I've nothing else to offer.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 31 2003 - 17:18:22 MDT