Lower Import Prices Haven't Lifted Living Standards After All

From: randy (cryofan@mylinuxisp.com)
Date: Sat Aug 30 2003 - 14:55:46 MDT

  • Next message: Samantha Atkins: "Re: would you vote for this man?"

    I know all the freemarketeers here will love this essay from:

    http://www.tradealert.org/view_art.asp?Prod_ID=879

    Here is an excerpt:

    Lower Import Prices Haven't Lifted Living Standards After All
    Alan Tonelson
    Tuesday, August 26, 2003

     With even normally free-trading Republican Congressmen up in arms
    about globalization-related job loss, America's globalization-happy
    economic establishment is preparing its counter-attack. Among the
    trade-extremist bromides we're likely to hear most often is that
    today's monumental import levels are blessings for all Americans
    because they reduce consumer goods prices and thus raise real incomes.

    America's working families, we're told, benefit most because, as U.S.
    Trade Representative Robert Zoellick argues, "When trade is
    restricted, hard-working fathers and mothers pay the biggest portions
    of their paychecks for the higher costs food, clothing, and appliances
    imposed through taxes on trade."

    Unfortunately, there's no serious evidence to support these claims. In
    fact, when you look at the effects of trade not only on consumer
    prices but on wages and employment levels, it's clear that current
    trade policies and their impact have been undermining American living
    standards for decades.

    Take the biggest picture macroeconomic data. American economic history
    has long been a story of strongly rising real wages – that is, wages
    adjusted for the effects of inflation. These wages – the best measure
    of an American worker's value in the global labor market – were
    critical engines of an equally strong rise in American living
    standards. But during the 1970s, these engines stalled out.

    Real wages for all private sector workers peaked in 1973 at $9.08 per
    hour. Today, they've fallen to $8.33 per hour – more than 8 percent
    lower. Two points stand out from this development. First, as Zoellick
    has noted in speeches, this thirty-year period witnessed a more than
    doubling of trade volumes and returns on international investment as a
    share of the U.S. economy. Second, inflation-adjusted wages by
    definition take into account the widely documented and dramatic fall
    in the prices of most imported goods during this period.

    The only reasonable conclusion possible: Even though trade has helped
    bring lower consumer prices (along with more efficient production
    methods and a continuing fall in the prices of most raw materials,
    whether domestic or imported), wages have fallen even faster for the
    typical American. And the onset of wage stagnation coincides almost
    perfectly with the onset of the American economy's dramatic
    internationalization.

    -------------
    -Randy



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Aug 30 2003 - 15:04:20 MDT