RE: Sapir-Whorf hypothesis ?

From: Paul Grant (shade999@optonline.net)
Date: Mon Aug 04 2003 - 22:46:30 MDT

  • Next message: Paul Grant: "RE: Maternal diet as a kind of genetic modification"

    >Lee
    >P.S. So you are not an example of what Paul was talking about
    "hyperlexia"?

    I'm hyperlexic, but I found discrete mathematics to be quite a pain to
    pickup;
    mind you I excelled at geometric proofs. Anyways, long story short, it
    turned
    out that discrete mathematics (as its taught generally) was too abstract
    for me
    (ergo too many directions to go in for a "short" proof sans need)... I
    got discrete math
    when I studied the subject (theory of computation) that it was intended
    to
    be used in. Prior to actually seeing the end results (the end use of a
    theorem),
    I found it difficult to divine what was the intended result of the
    theorem and ergo
    a particular pathway to the end result (formal proof) in the alotted
    time...

    I picked up discrete mathematics trivially, once I had found the key to
    organize
    it around (in this case turing machines/automata/grammers). I
    *understand* calculus
    (the foundation, thought processes) intuitively though. Same goes for
    geometry and
    algebra. It was very clear to both me and my professor though that I
    didn't "learn"
    discrete math the same way other people did... It took a fundamentally
    different
    approach...

    Another really interesting portion is that the symbolic processing
    extends into my
    kinesthetic system (its got a different name now, but I don't remember
    it off the
    top of my head). I have extremely good sense recall when it comes to my
    skeletal
    muscular system, including the direction of said muscles when it comes
    to acquiring
    new skills. I have the equivalent of a shorthand grammer; I tell my
    muscles what I
    want them to do and they do it.

    anyways, i think its fascinating, although to be quite honest, I wasn'
    particularly
    happy that they chose to classify it as a disorder... I'm a big fan of
    the DSM-4;
    if it doesn't bother you, it shouldn't be a disorder... They seem to
    have left that portion
    out of the literature.. I think because they're targeting it towards
    parents coping
    with their kids (and the tendency towards antisocial behavior)...

    anyway,
    just thought I'ld share (at least my perspective)...

    omard-out



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Aug 04 2003 - 22:55:17 MDT