Re: Ground-breaking work in understanding of time

From: randy (cryofan@mylinuxisp.com)
Date: Sun Aug 03 2003 - 06:16:40 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "RE: Fermi "Paradox""

    On Fri, 01 Aug 2003 12:19:52 +1000, you wrote:

    >At 03:53 PM 7/31/03 -0700, Jeff wrote:
    >
    >>http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2003-07/icc-gwi072703.php
    >
    >I see that this poorly written and somewhat Sokal-like piece of fluff is
    >attributed to a PR agent:
    >
    >Brooke.Jones@australia.edu
    > Independent Communications Consultant
    >
    >< "Naturally the parameter and boundary of their respective position and
    >magnitude are naturally determinable up to the limits of possible
    >measurement as stated by the general quantum hypothesis and Heisenberg's
    >uncertainty principle, but this indeterminacy in precise value is not a
    >consequence of quantum uncertainty. What this illustrates is that in
    >relation to indeterminacy in precise physical magnitude, the micro and
    >macroscopic are inextricably linked, both being a part of the same parcel,
    >rather than just a case of the former underlying and contributing to the
    >latter." >
    >
    >Naturally. Yeep.
    >
    >Damien Broderick

    Slashdot discussion on this:
    http://science.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/08/03/029213&mode=thread&tid=134

    -------------
    -Randy

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Aug 03 2003 - 06:26:28 MDT