Re: NEWS:Why 'Terrordaq' will come - if the Pentagon likes it or not

From: Extropian Agroforestry Ventures Inc. (megao@sasktel.net)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 14:55:38 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "Re: Genocide sucks"

    Did you try the archived version (cache) on google?

    Rafal Smigrodzki wrote:

    > Giulio wrote:
    >
    > Assuming that the system would work, we have here an idea
    > > that someone at DARPA has considered worth spending millions on, on
    > > the basis of operational considerations, then has been dropped on the
    > > basis of ethical and PC considerations. So this looks like a terrific
    > > business opportunity for the private sector, as the BBC author says.
    > > It would be interesting taking a look at the DARPA project
    > > documentation, that has disappeared from the DARPA website, does
    > > anyone have copies? How could such a business be developed?
    >
    > ### I wouldn't be surprised if the Pentagon went ahead with a covert futures
    > market, open to FBI/Homeland Security?CIA/NSA/OtherUnheardOfSpyAgency
    > employees, so as to allow aggregation of data among persons most likely to
    > have data in the first place, with a big "Top Secret" stamp on it and some
    > deniability (perhaps as in a tolerated semi-informal betting market to be
    > ditched if the sanctimonious crowd gets wind of it). Almost all the benefits
    > of PAM, none of the exposure to idiots.
    >
    > Rafal



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 16:06:51 MDT