From: Reason (reason@exratio.com)
Date: Thu Jul 31 2003 - 21:53:23 MDT
---> nanowave
> >Ok, now this is less useful too general, I think.
>
> Hi reason and thanks for your feedback. I might have made an effort to
> determine what the GKES header on this thread meant before posting, but
> instead I simply 'winged-it' based on the remainder of the subject line.
>
> >One can assume that we're all interested in grassroots transhumanism, for
> example.
>
> I might have been more specific there. I meant 'meatspace grassroots
> transhumanism'. In other words, I am interested in
> transhumanism-for-dummies-like memes and vectors specifically enabling the
> general non to semi-technical population (or the 'proles' as spike might
> say) in my immediate geographical region (i.e. my salon client base) to
> favorably grasp, participate in, and profit from the project of
> transhumanism.
>
> >What, specifically, are you actually *doing* in the sense of organizing,
> running,
> >creating?
>
> Pretty much that.
Well, yes, but what *is* it that you are organizing/running/creating? e.g.
some people here manage transhumanist websites, others run advocacy groups,
others are scientists in appropriate fields with interesting projects, and
so forth.
> >I'd like to have some sort of lower-bound cut-off off on project
> >effort/size on this list in order to keep it useful.
>
> Surely you meant to type "this thread" not "this list". This
> list is for
> the discussion of things relevant to transhumanists and transhumanism. If
> just one other list member finds a part of what I write to be
> interesting or
> relevant to transhumanism, then what I have written is *useful* by
> definition. And up to eight times a day I might add.
Ah, I was referring to the text list (under construction by Dan Fabulich) of
definitive, identifiable, transhumanist-relevant larger projects that people
on this mailing list are working on.
Reason
http://www.exratio.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:06 MDT