Re: HUMANS and low genetic complexity

From: Damien Broderick (damienb@unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 22:36:47 MDT

  • Next message: Lee Corbin: "RE: toilet head dunking"

    Last night in Oz, the local ABC channel showed a half hour sob story
    program about an irascible immunologist, Malcolm Simons, now dying of
    cancer who decided years ago that `junk DNA' (introns) couldn't possibly be
    junk, because it'd have been darwinnowed out. This is a strange error to
    make, since it's obvious that hitchhikers *can* get lifts, but anyway. He
    spent a lot of time starting around 1987 eyeballing shitloads of genome
    code. In the 95% allegedly dud sequences he kept finding recurrent
    stretches. Ah-ha! If the junk were *really* junk, that should all be
    chaotic and random. (Another strange error, since the introns are thought
    to be fossil virus code and the like which obviously was highly structured
    to start with.) So he decided that the `non-coding' DNA must contain
    control systems (hardly a startling thought, surely), and so he...
    *patented access to introns in every living critter*. The company he helped
    start, Genetic Technologies, now owns this access gateway, and is going
    hard after all the other bio scientists throughout the world who wish to
    use junk stretches for any purpose at all. Meanwhile, the guy fell out with
    his partner and is now penniless and dying.

    http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s898887.htm

    http://www.abc.net.au/catalyst/stories/s898887.htm#transcript

    This has been... another Human Interest Story from the Frontiers of
    Research and Commerce.

    (There was damn-all science reported in the program, sorry. However,
    there's some coverage of the 19th International conference on Genetics at:

    http://www.abc.net.au/health/features/genetics/default.htm )

    Damien Broderick



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 22:45:23 MDT