RE: Tranquility

From: Randy S (cryofan@mylinuxisp.com)
Date: Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:16:51 MDT

  • Next message: Robert J. Bradbury: "ASTRO: A really really old planet..."

    Rafal Smigrodzki <rafal@smigrodzki.org> said:

    > Lee Corbin wrote:
    >
    > > But now Rafal has written
    > >
    > >> ### Persons of disagreeable disposition (such as you assume this
    > >> girl must be) can be asked to leave one's house. Nobody "has" to
    > >> live with someone like that. Incarceration without crime (or maybe I
    > >> should say, for the crime of not meeting one's parents'
    > >> expectations) is simply wrong.
    > >
    > > Okay, then at what age may one ask a child to leave one's house?
    > >
    > > Oh, I get it! :-) Good one. You may *ask* all that
    > > you want! It is a free country! It's just that you
    > > cannot *tell* a child to leave. Haw haw haw!
    >
    > ### On the contrary, since you are the owner of your house, you may demand
    > that others leave it, with or without a reason.
    >

    Anyone living for an extended time in a residence has certain rights. For
    example, if you let your friend stay in your house for free, you cannot just
    up and kick him out one day. Now if you have a rental contract, you can have
    the sheriff kick him out if you give notice. But if there is no written
    agreement, you may have to sue. So maybe the only way to get a kid to leave
    would be to sue--that is, if the kid did not want to leave. Even so, in such
    a lawsuit, I am not sure it would necessarily be a walkover. Even in that
    situtation, the kid may have a good srgument for staying.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jul 10 2003 - 14:25:54 MDT