Re: [wta-talk] Creating transhumanist-friendly mainstream big media

From: Natasha Vita-More (natasha@natasha.cc)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 13:58:06 MDT

  • Next message: J Corbally: "Re: toilet head dunking"

    At 07:58 AM 7/9/03 +0200, you wrote:
    Interesting Natasha, can you say something more of your media development
    plan?

    I'm not sure what you're referring to (maybe you are replying to someone
    else and not me?), but I can't think of a better way to deal with the media
    than what I have been doing for the past decade :-) But that is for my own
    work and not related to ExI.

    For ExI, I think the best plan is to provide reliable information and
    networking to the world community of futurists and those who want to know
    about the future. Also, producing material that helps people develop
    skills for understanding the development and use of new technologies and
    the social ramifications provides a service that is tangible.

    Getting media attention is not difficult. What is difficult is having
    enough substance that sticks.
    Also, I am more of a grassroots person and think producing
    transhumanist-friendly mainstream big media is done by many people, not one
    person or one organization. Thus, networking futurist organizations is the
    best development plan and working with cooperation, not competing for
    center stage which happens all to often in our community. Center stage is
    fun, but it's a lot more fun when you share it with people who share smart
    sportspersonship.

    In summary:

    1. Form an alliances with other futurist directed that are not
    necessarily transhumanist in scope;

    2. Work directly with other organizations for a team-effort and one in
    which each organization decides what their contribution will be to the goal
    rather than duplicating the same thing (we see this with Foresight
    Institute's gatherings which is pretty much the same as the ExI community;
    and also with WTA's membership and goals which tends to be a duplication of
    ExI. If Foresight focused on nanotechnology and encouraged its members to
    be members of ExI, we would have more money and better advantage. Further,
    if WTA had joined forces with ExI rather than try to compete, we would have
    had a much larger community that would have been more diverse and copacetic
    to transhumanist goals.

    3. Send out press releases weekly on publicized issues.

    Just some thoughts that I can think of off-hand. A more definitive
    strategy that ExI is working on is not ready for our transparent society. :-)

    Natasha

    >
    >###To this end, i already have some media interests that are reaching a
    >fairly wide audience and have a multi-media network that is launching
    >nationally within the next two months.
    >
    >All of these channels are based on building towards a transhuman friendly
    >future. So, this list adn transhumanism in general has at least channel
    >that is only 1 degree of separation from reaching a new, bigger and more
    >"mainstream" audience.
    >
    >All that needs to happen in order to begin broadcasting transhuman ideas
    >is for you to submit them. I can get them in print in a newspaper (soon to
    >be newspapers) and online (soon to be in print) with a magazine.
    >Additionally there will be other mediums available in the near future.###



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jul 09 2003 - 12:08:06 MDT