Two papers worth reading. Re: [wta-talk] Specific areas lacking advancement

From: Brett Paatsch (paatschb@optusnet.com.au)
Date: Mon Jul 07 2003 - 02:50:47 MDT

  • Next message: Brett Paatsch: "Re: Cryonics and information theory"

    Harvey writes:
    >
    > > http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/Papers/PBAoNP.html
    > > http://sageke.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/sageke;2003/1/vp1
    >
    > I can't get to either of those pages, but I do applaud any real
    > scientific work being done.

    Sorry, I have the papers downloaded myself and didn't actually check
    the links.

    I think the one I specified for Robert's paper is accurate but the
    spelling of aeiveos usually throws me if I don't cut and paste it.

    I wouldn't call Robert's paper an easy read but both are imo excellent
    examples of papers that are structured in such a way as to invite
    critical thinking and the challenges to their assumptions.

    I think the link to Robert Bradbury's paper on Protein Based Assembly
    of Nanoscale Parts should work.
    http://www.aeiveos.com/~bradbury/Papers/PBAoNP.html

    To get to Aubrey de Grey's paper on An engineer's approach to the
    development of real anti-aging medicine try.
    http://www.gen.cam.ac.uk/sens/manu16.pdf

    Regards,
    Brett

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 02:57:39 MDT