Re: How best to spend US$200 billion? RE: `twisted ethics prevalent on the ex...

From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:48:10 MDT

  • Next message: Rafal Smigrodzki: "RE: Globalization was RE: Was Re: PHYSICS: force fields (RANT)"

    In a message dated 6/11/2003 12:59:41 PM Central Standard Time,
    matus@matus1976.com quotes: "Well, that's not actually true. The coalition of the willing
    went in to stop development and use of WMDs. Laudable self interest, if it is
    true (??). However, the saving of the iraqi people was *not* the driver for
    this action." So? Again the primary motivation is irrelevant.

    To which you replied, "So? Again the primary motivation is irrelevant."

    Michael,
           Be careful, there is a subtle trap in that quotation you cited. On
    March third Bush gave a speech laying out all his reasons for going to war.
    WMDs was only one of several reasons given. We tend to forget that.
    Ron h.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 11 2003 - 13:57:17 MDT