Re: FWD [SK] Re: A Field Guide to Skepticism (3 of 3)

From: Damien Broderick (damienb@unimelb.edu.au)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 22:16:35 MDT

  • Next message: Dan Fabulich: "Re: Alltheism was RE: The Simulation Argument again"

    At 12:34 PM 6/5/03 -0500, Lee Daniel Crocker wrote:

    >Well, then, he should go claim his Randi prize and wouldn't have
    >to worry about the sales of his book. <http://www.randi.org/>.

    You'd think so, but Randi is a slippery customer, and besides his target
    seems to be those palpable frauds or self-deluded ninnies who are easily
    unmasked, dowsers who can't dowse and aura-readers who can't tell if
    anyone's standing behind a screen although they swear they can see colorful
    auras poking over the top. Presented with a probabilistic phenomenon, his
    methods of assessment are too coarse. That would be equally true, I think,
    if he were trying to evaluate neutrino flavor shifting en route from the
    Sun to the Earth. `Hey, c'morn, I can't *see* these little buggers, and you
    say most of them just zip right through lead, I want to see eight out of
    ten on this meter here RIGHT NOW, I'm mean, WHO ARE YOU KIDDING?'

    Damien Broderick



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 05 2003 - 22:24:25 MDT