Re: Alltheism was RE: The Simulation Argument again

From: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky (sentience@pobox.com)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 16:43:06 MDT

  • Next message: Eliezer S. Yudkowsky: "Re: FWD [SK] Re: A Field Guide to Skepticism (3 of 3)"

    Dan Fabulich wrote:
    >
    > Since you say that "God" exists in some possible world, you are therefore
    > forced to conclude that "God" exists in all possible words, including, of
    > course, this one!
    >
    > Of course, if you think that there is ANY possible world in which "God"
    > doesn't exist, you are similarly forced to accept that "God" exists in no
    > possible worlds at all!

    If you define "God" as an entity which pervades all areas of all Level IV
    Processes, then a Tegmarkian atheist would readily reply that "God" does
    not exist, regardless of whether there's a hubblebubble somewhere (*not*
    here) that contains a locally powerful entity answering to the name of
    Jehovah.

    -- 
    Eliezer S. Yudkowsky                          http://singinst.org/
    Research Fellow, Singularity Institute for Artificial Intelligence
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 05 2003 - 16:53:16 MDT