Re: [Iraq] The real reason for the war

From: John K Clark (jonkc@att.net)
Date: Thu Jun 05 2003 - 11:55:46 MDT

  • Next message: Ramez Naam: "RE: [Iraq] The real reason for the war"

    "Ramez Naam" <mez@apexnano.com> Wrote:

    >The real question is, would their task have been significantly harder
    >without the facilities in Afghanistan? I doubt it.

    Do you? I don't. Even if you're a crazy fundamentalist you are not going to
    crash an airliner into a skyscraper just because I say so unless you are
    convinced my plan will work and am some sort of a superior human being who
    should be followed. To do that I need to isolate you from the rest of the
    world and indoctrinate you, and to do that I need at least one secure base,
    and to do that I need state support. They didn't go to Afghanistan to get a
    tan I can tell you that.

    > Iraq wasn't a substantially terror-supporting state.

    That's the beauty of it! The message is clear, if you are a evil
    totalitarian state you had better do your damn best to make sure the USA is
    not hit by another 911 because guilty or innocent you will be blamed for it
    and I guarantee you that will not be healthy.

    >John, would you be so blasé if every person in the world had a global
    >destruct button they could push?

    I'm not blasé, I know it's a terrible problem but I also know that making
    nice to Islam will not reduce their anger one iota because the root cause of
    that anger was not any specific action committed by the west. They are angry
    at us for what we are not what we did. They would be less angry if the
    foundation of the west was some dogma, even some dogma they didn't like,
    instead it is based on free markets and pragmatic problem solving and that
    frightens and angers them. They would be less angry if our system didn't
    work very well but we're rich free and powerful and they are poor oppressed
    and weak. 800 years ago Islam was the most advanced civilization on Earth
    but its been straight downhill since, today they are not even second or
    third but dead last; we have the word of The Profit so it can't be our
    fault, it must be due to those evil westerners, our only mistake was
    embracing too many 16'th century ideas, we should go back to 13'th century
    ideas.

    Sure all that anger is dangerous and needs to be defused, I'm not sure what
    will work but I am sure what won't work, starting a be kind to terrorists
    policy will not work.

        John K Clark jonkc@att.net



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jun 05 2003 - 12:06:17 MDT