From: Dehede011@aol.com
Date: Tue Jun 03 2003 - 19:58:03 MDT
In a message dated 6/3/2003 10:43:18 AM Central Standard Time,
pfallon@ptd.net writes:A shorthand summary of PNAC strategies that have become U.S.
policy[*]:
[*] excerpted from A PNAC Primer by Bernard Weiner
Pat,
So what you have really given us is the work of Barnard Weiner, a
social psychologist in California that according to the Google search I did is a
writer of so called political analysis attacking the US.
Your contribution seems to have been the statement that, "And they
have been remarkably successful in seeing it implemented. They should be proud
[instead of suddenly disowning the "neo-con" label]...they did exactly what
they said they were going to do."
What you have not proven, I don't believe, is that they ever used the
the term Neo Conservative to any extent at all. So you seem to be begging the
question when you allege they have disown the neo-con label. How can anyone
disown what they never owned.
The important thing seems to be that today when I read the terms "neo
con" "neo conservative" "Extreme right wing of the Republican Party," "Leo
Strauss" I am sure to be reading an attack made by some one on the left wing that
never reveal their own affilliations. Strauss in particular seems to be a
popular straw man to be used in these attacks. That is interesting in that
even so sketchy a reading of Strauss as mine reveals that Strauss has been stood
on his head by so called analysts.
But I do appreciate you alerting me that Mr. Wolfowitz and others at
the third level of our government (or below) are the puppet masters pulling the
strings on George Bush.
Let me add to your information. You have missed a major part of the
Republican's nefarious plan to take over the government. As the plan and
planners have been in all the papers it is hard to imagine how you missed them --
never the less you did miss them in your monologue. The overthrow of the
Democrat House of Representatives was engineered by Newt Gingrich, Dick Armey,
etal. Can you imagine Wolfowitz, Strauss and others succeeding in their attempt
without a Republican Congress to build on?
In addition I most sincerely believe that Reagan did not bring down
the Soviet Union it collapsed of its own weight. Not only that but the Congress
in 1994 wasn't won by Gingrich so much as it was lost by Clinton.
Obviously that indicates that the group of Republican Skullduggers
that you mistakingly call the Neo Cons had a pipeline into the top levels of the
Soviet leadership as well as the Clinton Whitehouse. Somehow you have missed
the Skull and Bones Society up at Yale and also Trotsky's role. Do they come
in at this point?
Seriously I think you gentlemen have gone off the deep end and
unwittingly ended up in comedy.
Ron h.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 03 2003 - 20:09:32 MDT