Re: Sometimes biology sucks. New link between cancer and aging.

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Tue Jun 24 2003 - 10:07:30 MDT

  • Next message: Alfio Puglisi: "Food labels and consumer information (was Re: Protesters swarm Calif. biotech meeting)"

    On Tue, 24 Jun 2003, Brett Paatsch wrote:

    > In the article below it seems the myc cancer causing gene
    > (which is already known to be responsible for about a third
    > of all cancers (bad gene, very bad! ) produces the protein
    > that activates the Werner's gene (a fine friendly gene, one
    > warms naturally to it, - because in healthy folk that don't suffer
    > from the rare premature aging syndrome known as Werners
    > when the gene is broken) it is actually involved in keeping
    > cells young and growing.

    I think you may be making things overly simple. When the WS
    gene is defective, it produces DNA deletions (*that* is very
    bad) due to its exonuclease activity (Oshima J et al, Cancer Res
    Jan 2002). It appears that p53 is responsible for regulating
    the exonuclease activity of the WS protein (Brosh RM, et al
    JBC Sep 2001). Now it may be that MYC is upregulating the
    production of WRN resulting in a gene dosage imbalance with
    p53 that allows the exonuclease activity to proceed when it
    is undesirable to do so. But there appear to be other players
    since WRN can be phosphorylated at one or more locations.

    So I wouldn't point the finger at MYC until it becomes clearer
    when WRN is supposed to function as a helicase and when it is
    supposed to function as an exonuclease. Before we are done with
    this I think we are going to find that exonucleases in general
    (WRN, Artemis, etc.) may be an interesting, perhaps even significant,
    part of the puzzle.

    Robert



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 24 2003 - 10:20:35 MDT