Re: Why believe the truth?

From: Robin Hanson (rhanson@gmu.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 - 12:39:50 MDT

  • Next message: Ramez Naam: "RE: greatest threats to survival (was: why believe the truth?)"

    On 6/18/2003, Mark Walker wrote:
    > > ... self-deception may be what some, or even most people, really want in
    > > reflective equilibrium. ... Bet ... the few minutes a day you are
    > rational,
    > > and then go back to your blissful ignorance.
    >
    >Do you think choosing this life would be a moral failing? I think this is
    >where we entered into the debate. I thought you felt the same pull as me
    >that abandoning the truth is a moral failing of some sort. (And if so, what
    >is the basis for this claim?) This is not to say that if we think there is a
    >moral failing here that we would coerce people into not living the life of
    >blissful ignorance, this is only a question of how we are to judge them.

    I'm torn. On the one hand I have as strong an emotional reaction of disgust
    and moral indignation as I ever have to anything when I think of people
    purposely allowing themselves to believe false things. It is as close to
    "sin" as I see. But on the other hand, I have the economists' usual live
    and let live reaction; it isn't bad per se unless it has bad consequences.
    I don't see any easy way to resolve this.

    Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
    Assistant Professor of Economics, George Mason University
    MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
    703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 18 2003 - 12:50:14 MDT