Re: Why believe the truth?

From: Robin Hanson (rhanson@gmu.edu)
Date: Wed Jun 18 2003 - 09:28:37 MDT

  • Next message: Kevin Freels: "nanotech legislation information forwarded from my email - our opinions needed"

    At 11:01 AM 6/18/2003 -0400, Eliezer S. Yudkowsky wrote:
    >>Sure there is only one total explanation, but are you Eliezer S.
    >>Yudkowsky going to discover all of its parts by yourself and then reveal
    >>them all to the world in one grand revelation? We are rich, in knowledge
    >>as in other things, because of a division of labor. You need to work
    >>with many other people to discover the one true explanation. So you need
    >>to find a place within this division of labor where others can appreciate
    >>your contributions and you can appreciate theirs. ...
    >
    >... whether many people or a few people are working out their areas of the
    >One Explanation, my point is that I would not strive for modularity in my
    >maps unless I thought that reality itself was modular with respect to the
    >thing I was mapping. This idea of building a philosophy that is modular,
    >where you can stand regardless of who else falls... it may help on public
    >relations but how can it possibly be *right*? Isn't this a sign that one
    >has fallen into "mere philosophizing", unconnected from the rest of the
    >universe? ... When I am *designing* something, then yes, I will try and
    >make the design modular because that is a good heuristic for humans to
    >use. When I am trying to *discover* something I will not try to make the
    >*explanation* modular unless I think the *reality* is modular ...

    A *contribution* to knowledge does not equal an *explanation*. If you are
    studying field B that depends on field A, and you happen to believe A2
    while most people believe A1, it is not enough for you to show that A2
    leads to B2; you should also show what A1 leads to. If A1 leads to B1, you
    should say so. You are not saying anything false or misleading by doing
    this. You are allowing progress and the division of labor to continue
    without requiring that everyone agree with you on everything.

    Robin Hanson rhanson@gmu.edu http://hanson.gmu.edu
    Assistant Professor of Economics, George Mason University
    MSN 1D3, Carow Hall, Fairfax VA 22030-4444
    703-993-2326 FAX: 703-993-2323



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 18 2003 - 09:38:23 MDT