RE: greatest threats to survival (was: why believe the truth?)

From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Tue Jun 17 2003 - 20:00:03 MDT

  • Next message: Phil Osborn: "Manga Reality"

    Ramez Naam wrote,
    > Most AI researchers that I know of are not overly concerned with
    > processing power. They think the fundamental problems of AI are
    > design problems.
    >
    > But as you point out, roboticists do care about computing power.
    >
    > I find this an interesting dichotomy, actually. Roboticists, computer
    > vision researchers, and the like deal in interacting with the messy
    > physical world.

    This makes sense to me. Robotics is hardware. AI is software.
    Characteristically speaking, software is more predictable and can be made to
    work. We are just working on making it smaller, cooler, faster. Software
    is not very predictable. We seem to be making it more bloated, more
    "cooler", and slower.

    In the future we want the AI(software) to design the hardware. If only we
    could figure out a way to do the reverse! This is probably where uploading,
    simulation, and evolution come in. This might be a creative compromise, but
    it also might lead us to building things we don't understand.

    > Right now if I had infinite computing power and wanted to do it I'd
    > employ an evolutionary technique. Unfortunately, this is Eliezer's
    > worst nightmare - a new form of intelligence grown by evolution and
    > not necessarily friendly to us.

    I agree - on the nightmare part. This also is similar to how software is
    built today. It is "evolved". Not in the true sense of the word as we mean
    it. But it grows in little pieces. As things break, we find a way to
    adapt. It becomes a bloated inefficient collection of junk code rather than
    a sleak, elegant, well-designed thing. In fact, some people have argued
    that faster hardware helps prop-up poorer programs. If you have excess
    speed, why be efficient? If you have excess memory and disk, why conserve?
    If you can reboot in a couple of minutes, who cares if you crash? But for
    AI, I certainly don't want errors, bugs, security holes, and crashes every
    day.

    --
    Harvey Newstrom, CISM, CISSP, IAM, IBMCP, GSEC
    Certified InfoSec Manager, Certified IS Security Pro, NSA-certified
    InfoSec Assessor, IBM-certified Security Consultant, SANS-cert GSEC
    <HarveyNewstrom.com> <Newstaff.com>
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jun 17 2003 - 20:10:46 MDT