RE: META: Dishonest debate (was "cluster bombs")

From: Lee Corbin (lcorbin@tsoft.com)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 17:55:49 MDT

  • Next message: Lee Corbin: "RE: META: Letting Cooler Heads Prevail"

    Hal had already written

    > I would encourage everyone to try not to overstate and inflame the
    > situation. If you want to make a complaint about excessive rhetoric,
    > quote the words in question rather than trying to paraphrase them or
    > offering a general characterization of the tone. The latter practices
    > are far more fraught with error than most people realize.

    and

    > I encourage all parties to tone down the rhetoric and avoid making
    > stronger claims about the actions of others than are justified by
    > the facts.

    So my appeal for cooler heads to prevail is greatly redundant.
    (Though here---surely---a little redundancy is probably good!)

    Also, remember my trick for turning an accusation into a question!

    E.g.: "Why wouldn't this strike anyone as immoral?"

           "That *sounds* anti-American to me---just why isn't it?"

           "Do you know the definition of defamation? Aren't you
              guilty of defaming X?"

    The literal, text-based portions of our minds deal with questions
    vastly better than they deal with accusations!

    Lee



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 16 2003 - 18:05:37 MDT