RE: Investing

From: gts (gts_2000@yahoo.com)
Date: Mon Jun 16 2003 - 09:08:57 MDT

  • Next message: Michael Wiik: "[IRAQ]: cognitive dissonance"

    Olga Bourlin wrote:

    > Huh? I wasn't talking about properly timing anything. I was
    > talking about minimizing one's risks with stops.

    Use of a stop loss order is an attempt to time the market. It is a bet that
    the price will continue to drop after you are stopped out.

    The idea that they "minimize risk" is wrong, at least in the manner in which
    you're using the term, because there is something called opportunity cost
    that one incurs the moment one sells and goes to cash. The risk of
    opportunity cost offsets the risk of being in the market. Money markets pay
    a miserable rate of interest, far less than the market has returned over the
    long run. When you sell and go to cash the difference is a LOSS.

    Stop loss orders would make sense only if we could say that falling prices
    lead to more falling prices. But as I've stated, despite appearances, prices
    do not trend. Studies show that the direction of price change on day x in no
    way influences the direction of price change on day x+1. The appearance of
    short term trends in the market is an illusion. Even random data appears to
    trend.

    -gts



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jun 16 2003 - 09:17:11 MDT