From: Harvey Newstrom (mail@HarveyNewstrom.com)
Date: Sun Jun 15 2003 - 14:23:10 MDT
Dehede011@aol.com wrote,
> Harvey, the problem is that we have been hearing that explanation
> since the Vietnamese war. It reduces to a problem in statistics.
> If you have came down on one side fifteen times in a row what are
> the odds you will favor that same side the next time. After a
> while regardless of how you explain it you are selecting the U. S.
> to criticize and giving comfort to its enemies by your silence.
> All in all your explanation is sophisticated but not persuasive.
> Ron h.
No, this is not the problem! I HAVEN'T supported the Vietnamese, China,
Cuba, Iraq, Iran, Saudis, Osama, Saddam, Communists, Socialists, fascism, al
Quaeda, the 911 hijackers, terrorists, or the Hate America First crowd. I
am merely a Democrat who dislikes George Bush's politics. How does that
make me an enemy.
You are using binary thinking to say that I can't complain about George Bush
or anything he does without being an enemy combatant. This is wrong. Look
back through the list archives. I have never defended any of these enemies.
It is a stretch to claim that criticizing George Bush or questioning the
government makes me an enemy of the state. I have never given comfort to
the enemies of America, and it is a damn lie for you to claim that I have.
Please put up or shut up. Go through the archives and point out any
specific statement that constitutes giving comfort to the enemy. Or else
SHUT THE HELL UP! These baseless accusations are just plain slanderous. You
have no reason to accuse me or most of the other fine list participants of
being a traitor, terrorist, or enemy supporter.
-- Harvey Newstrom, CISM, CISSP, IAM, IBMCP, GSEC Certified InfoSec Manager, Certified IS Security Pro, NSA-certified InfoSec Assessor, IBM-certified Security Consultant, SANS-cert GSEC <HarveyNewstrom.com> <Newstaff.com>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Jun 15 2003 - 14:33:39 MDT