RE: Gene Mutations and Beneficial Effects

From: Robert J. Bradbury (bradbury@aeiveos.com)
Date: Fri May 30 2003 - 19:43:27 MDT

  • Next message: Spudboy100@aol.com: "Re: Red Rectangle of Qwelldor"

    On Fri, 30 May 2003, Party of Citizens wrote:

    > Is it even a gene-mutation effect? I was trying to differentiate between
    > gene mutations and gene splicing in genetic engineering. The latter has a
    > number of success stories going for it. I don't know of any for the
    > former. Do you?

    "Golden rice" and most other GMO crops (or animals) are what
    one could call "gene splicing" products. But all natural
    breeding (think of the varieties of roses) are "gene mutation"
    products. Most modern agricultural products are combinations
    of "gene mutation" and "gene breeding" products. Gene breeding
    could be viewed in some ways as a "natural" form of "gene splicing".
    Humans have been selecting and breeding from both "natural" and
    "generated" (using radiation) mutations for many many years
    (the "natural" approach since the dawn of agriculture).

    This is a major reason that scientists who really understand
    genetics and the history of crop development view the GMO
    crop debate as somewhat contrived.

    Robert

    P.S. A "Google" on "Golden rice" and daffodils provides some
    interesting reading. The genes added to produce "golden rice"
    are "natural" but somewhat foreign.

    P.P.S. A good percentage of "natural" mutations are generated by "natural"
    radiation (e.g. cosmic rays, radioactive potassium or UV radiation) so any
    debates about the use of radiation to produce new types of crops is pretty
    specious too.



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 30 2003 - 19:54:25 MDT